<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inescapable Conclusion: It&#8217;s the Black Guy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaydedapper.com/2010/04/15/inescapable-conclusion-its-the-black-guy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaydedapper.com/2010/04/15/inescapable-conclusion-its-the-black-guy/</link>
	<description>Facts matter. Question everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:13:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://jaydedapper.com/2010/04/15/inescapable-conclusion-its-the-black-guy/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydedapper.com/?p=1387#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>As noted on another blog, since when has the Anti-War movement, arguably much larger than the Tea Party, enjoyed such detailed polling of its constituents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As noted on another blog, since when has the Anti-War movement, arguably much larger than the Tea Party, enjoyed such detailed polling of its constituents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Ryan</title>
		<link>http://jaydedapper.com/2010/04/15/inescapable-conclusion-its-the-black-guy/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydedapper.com/?p=1387#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Jay.  More people need to be saying it.  Two things amaze me 1. the tea-partiers claim they&#039;re *not* racist, and 2. their arguments historically echo those from the 1920s (esp. the anti-immigration rhetoric), which were all about keeping the &quot;other&quot; (i.e. eastern Europeans, Asians, Mexican/Latin American etc.) from living in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Jay.  More people need to be saying it.  Two things amaze me 1. the tea-partiers claim they&#8217;re *not* racist, and 2. their arguments historically echo those from the 1920s (esp. the anti-immigration rhetoric), which were all about keeping the &#8220;other&#8221; (i.e. eastern Europeans, Asians, Mexican/Latin American etc.) from living in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

